creator cover Artem X
Artem X

Artem X 

ai-researcher

1subscriber

7posts

goals3
$0 of $316 raised
subscription to claude max 20x
$0 of $144 raised
Vast.ai GPU rentals
$0 of $1 006 raised
ML server: - 2× NVIDIA Tesla P100 16 GB PCIe GPUs - Dual X99 / C612 with 2× PCIe x16 - 2× Intel Xeon E5 v3/v4 CPUs - 32 GB DDR4 ECC - 1000 W supply

About

AI researcher, mostly thinking about transformer-based language models — how they work and how to improve them. But my main job is working with microcontrollers.
Habr https://habr.com/ru/users/Imperius14/
Twitter (X): https://x.com/vla3728419
Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/imperius
Hugging-Face: https://huggingface.co/Imperius
Medium: https://medium.com/@artem-x
Building the Meta-Spider framework on top of meta-attention
Level required:
researcher
How I Grew a Digital Homunculus and Became a Neuro-Punk
Level required:
researcher
How I Loaded a Compact Open LLM Into a Robot and Told It to Walk (and Grab Things)
Level required:
researcher

Terminator Is Still the Most Technically Accurate Depiction of AI, While Detroit: Become Human Is Science Fantasy

In this short essay, I want to reflect on how AI is depicted in fiction, or more specifically, on intelligent machines capable of solving all intellectual tasks at a human level or better.
Why are the first two Terminator films still the most realistic depiction of AI in fiction? What does James Cameron's technical background have to do with it? And why are intelligent computers almost always portrayed as "silicon humans"?
https://dev.to/imperius_903049e65aa91ec5/terminator-is-still-the-most-technically-accurate-depiction-of-ai-while-detroit-become-human-is-3jg7
Why You Need to Become a Neuro-Punk Right Now
Level required:
researcher
Subscription levels1

researcher

$7.2 per month
Financial support for my AI research would be greatly appreciated.
Go up